CAR DEDUCTIONS ALLOWED EVEN THOUGH NO LIEN
In re Thomas, Case No 06-21108
In re Camacho, Case No. 06-20729
October 2007,  Judge Berger

UST Motion To Dismiss under 707(b) for presumed abuse based upon totality of circumstances was denied. The Court concluded that the debtors are entitled to claim vehicle ownership for expenses, even though debtors did not have liens or leases on the vehicles. (See In Re Howell, 06-11652 for opposing view from Judge Nugent.). Judge Lungstrum subsequently reversed and remanded Thomas, 382 B.R. 793 (D. Kan. 2008).

Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee

Related posts:

1. My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?
2. Topeka Debtors Allowed Means Test Deduction for Cars With No Liens
3. Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed
4. My Wife Didn't File Bankruptcy, Can I Deduct Her Car Payment on My Means Test?
5. Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances