<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Bankruptcy Law Information&#187; 401(k)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bankruptcykansas.info/tag/401k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325(b)(1)(B)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeThample]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disposable income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projected disposable income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[401(K) DISBURSEMENT PRE PETITION IS CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME BUT NOT PROJECTED DISPOSBLE INCOME In re DeThample, Case No 07-11829 July 5, 2008, Judge Nugent Under 1325(b)(1)(B), a singular, one time disbursement is “income” for purposes of determining Current Monthly Income (CMI), but followed Judge Karlin’s Lanning decision in determining what constituted Projected Disposable Income (PDI). [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/my-car-is-paid-for-can-i-deduct-ownership-expense-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?'>My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?</a> <small>OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/' rel='bookmark' title='Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies'>Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies</a> <small>A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/means-test-form-controls-unless-significant-changes-circumstances/' rel='bookmark' title='Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances'>Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances</a> <small>B22C CONTROLS UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES In re Lanning,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

