Tag Archive: Judge Karlin

Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too

LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE In re Melvin, Case No. 07-22352 December 2008 Judge Somers Court extended the Lanning analysis and found there was no binding precedent on the issue of whether actual of 22C expenses were mandated and found that 22C expenses may be deviated from also. This is consistent with dicta in Lanning,…

How Do I Deduct My Non-Filing Spouse’s Expenses on the Bankruptcy Means Test?

HOW EXACTLY DO WE DEDUCT ‘MARITAL ADJUSTMENTS’? In re Dugan, Case No. 07-40899 August, 2008, Judge Karlin Chapter 13 Trustee objections to debtor’s attempts to include a marital adjustment on Lines 13 and 19 for a non-filing spouse and a deduction for transportation expenses. Court allowed, in theory, the marital deduction, but found it had…

Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies

A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME (CMI) ON LINE 47 OF B22C In re Hoss, Case No. 08-10365 In re Arroyo, Case No. 07-12779 August 2008, Judge Nugent In above median income (AMI) cases, debtors sought to deduct contract payments, rather than the stripped off/crammed down amounts….

401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test

401(K) DISBURSEMENT PRE PETITION IS CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME BUT NOT PROJECTED DISPOSBLE INCOME In re DeThample, Case No 07-11829 July 5, 2008, Judge Nugent Under 1325(b)(1)(B), a singular, one time disbursement is “income” for purposes of determining Current Monthly Income (CMI), but followed Judge Karlin’s Lanning decision in determining what constituted Projected Disposable Income (PDI)….

Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed

MORE LINE BY LINES OF B22C In re Hays, Case No 07-41285 April, 2008, Judge Karlin 13 Trustee objections to debtor’s attempts to claim living expenses for non-dependent debtors as well as for secured debt on a timeshare. Court followed Law and disallowed adult child expenses. The Court allowed the debt on the timeshare to…

Nonworking Adult Son Not Counted in Household

B22C CASE, LINE BY LINE… In re Law, Case No. 07-40863 April 2008, Judge Karlin Court sustained 13 Trustee’s objection to confirmation as debtor included: adult son in household size, tax levy on Line 33 and duplicated it on Line 49 and unencumbered vehicle on line 28. The decision is a good analysis of the…

Deduct Full Secured Debt on Bankruptcy Means Test

OK FOR CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS TO TAKE B22C DEDUCTION FOR FULL PAYMENT RATHER THAN CRAM DOWN AMOUNT In re Allen, Case No. 07-41327 February 2008, Judge Karlin Objected to confirmation on the basis that Debtor’s means test calculations erroneously included the full amount of the pre-petition car payments rather than the reduced or  crammed-down amounts….

No Early Payoff, But Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Modification Possible

PLAN MAY NOT PROPOSE EARLY PAYOFF BUT 1329 MAY ALLOW POST CONFIRMATION MODIFICATION In re Kidd, et al, Case No. 06-41232 August 2007, Judge Karlin The Court recognized changes in 1324(b)(4) and held that debtors may not propose an early pay off but may obtain the same in the right circumstances via 1329. Digest by: …

Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances

B22C CONTROLS UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES In re Lanning, Case No. 06-41037 May 2007, Judge Karlin Over the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection, the Court confirmed the plan because of significant changes in circumstances at the time of filing that caused Line 58 on B22C to be higher than what the debtor could afford to…

My Income Is Below Median, How Long Do I Pay My Chapter 13 Payments?

BELOW THE LINE DEBTOR MUST RUN 36 MONTHS In re Pohl, Case No. 06-41236 May 2007, Judge Karlin The Court determined that a below the line debtor’s case must “run” 36 months, unless it pays off all claims in full, citing 1325(b)(4). Below the line disposable income determined by Schedule J, since the bottom half…

GAP Insurance Not In Car Lender's PMSI

GAP insurance, service contracts, administrative fees and the traded-in car payoff are not part of a car lender’s purchase-money secured claim in chapter 13 bankruptcy and can be crammed-down if the car is worth less than the loan balance, Judge Janice Miller Karlin ruled this week in In Re Miller, Case No. 08-40935, (Bankr. D.Kan….

eXTReMe Tracker