<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Bankruptcy Information &#187; Judge Nugent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bankruptcykansas.info/tag/judge-nugent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info</link>
	<description>Topeka Attorneys Helping You Get the Fresh Start Only Federal Bankruptcy Laws Can Give You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Negative Equity</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/negative-equity/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/negative-equity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1327]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1329]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[910 car claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kuhasz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase money security interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEGATIVE EQUITY ISSUE NOT RULED UPON IN 1327 CASE In re Kuhasz, Case No. 07-20282 November 2008, Judge Somers Court noted split within the district. Judge Karlin excluded negative equity from PMSI claim in In re Padgett, 389 BR 203, while Judge Nugent included it. In re Ford 387 BR 14827 but declined to rule [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/negative-equity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Is My Attorney Paid to Defend Dismissal?</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/3665/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/3665/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtor attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defending dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumptive fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/3665/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WICHITA NO LOOK FEE FOR DEFENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS MAY BE $350.00 In re Kiser, Case No. 06-11453 January 2009, Judge Nugent Debtor filed a motion to modify plan to increase monthly payment and to pay attorney fees of $500.00. Court allowed $400.00. Judge Nugent quoted Judge Karlin in Beck in supporting its conclusion that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/3665/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Wichita?</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-are-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-in-wichita/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-are-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-in-wichita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filing Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[330]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumptive fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[13 ATTORNEY FEES IN WICHITA In re Mayer, Case No. 06-10013 October 2006, Judge Nugent This is Judge Nugent’s fee decision. The “presumptive” fee in Wichita is $2500, without prejudice to fee applications, based upon the language of 330, testimony and the various factors recited. Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-are-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-in-wichita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reconversion Fails, No Discharge Bankruptcy Dismissed</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/reconversion-denied-no-discharge-bankruptcy-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/reconversion-denied-no-discharge-bankruptcy-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not eligible for discharge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CONVERSION CONFUSION In re Fry, Case No. 04-16887 October 2008 Judge Nugent Debtor converted from 13 to 7 and then learned she was not eligible for a 7 and attempted to converted back to 13. Case dismissed as an “end run” around 7 discharge. Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/reconversion-denied-no-discharge-bankruptcy-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreclosure No Excuse for No Credit Counseling Before Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/foreclose-no-excuse-for-no-credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/foreclose-no-excuse-for-no-credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Outcomes, Fraud, Bankruptcy Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filing Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[109(h)(1)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exigent circumstances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro se]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAILURE TO OBTAIN CREDIT COUNSELING—EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES In re Thomas, Case No. 06-10242 March 2006, Judge Nugent Pro se case dismissed for failure to obtain credit counseling. Certificate of exigent circumstances which recites pending foreclosure insufficient, case dismissed. 109(h)(1).﻿]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/foreclose-no-excuse-for-no-credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-means-test-for-expenses-too/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-means-test-for-expenses-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[22C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B22C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy means test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtor's expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE In re Melvin, Case No. 07-22352 December 2008 Judge Somers Court extended the Lanning analysis and found there was no binding precedent on the issue of whether actual of 22C expenses were mandated and found that 22C expenses may be deviated from also. This is consistent with dicta in Lanning, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-means-test-for-expenses-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cram down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current monthly income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtor's expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secured debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME (CMI) ON LINE 47 OF B22C In re Hoss, Case No. 08-10365 In re Arroyo, Case No. 07-12779 August 2008, Judge Nugent In above median income (AMI) cases, debtors sought to deduct contract payments, rather than the stripped off/crammed down amounts. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-is-income-for-means-test/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-is-income-for-means-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325(b)(1)(B)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeThample]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disposable income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projected disposable income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[401(K) DISBURSEMENT PRE PETITION IS CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME BUT NOT PROJECTED DISPOSBLE INCOME In re DeThample, Case No 07-11829 July 5, 2008, Judge Nugent Under 1325(b)(1)(B), a singular, one time disbursement is “income” for purposes of determining Current Monthly Income (CMI), but followed Judge Karlin’s Lanning decision in determining what constituted Projected Disposable Income (PDI). [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-is-income-for-means-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deduct Full Secured Debt on Bankruptcy Means Test</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/full-secured-debt-deducted-means-test/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/full-secured-debt-deducted-means-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325(b)(1)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cram down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoss and Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secured claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcykansas.info/2009/12/24/2913/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK FOR CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS TO TAKE B22C DEDUCTION FOR FULL PAYMENT RATHER THAN CRAM DOWN AMOUNT In re Allen, Case No. 07-41327 February 2008, Judge Karlin Objected to confirmation on the basis that Debtor&#8217;s means test calculations erroneously included the full amount of the pre-petition car payments rather than the reduced or  crammed-down amounts. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/full-secured-debt-deducted-means-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Car Deduction Allowed on Means Test, Reversed by District Court</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/car-deduction-on-means-test/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/car-deduction-on-means-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Michaux, Topeka Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camacho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Lundstrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projected disposable income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wieland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcykansas.info/?p=2907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CAR DEDUCTIONS ALLOWED EVEN THOUGH NO LIEN In re Thomas, Case No 06-21108 In re Camacho, Case No. 06-20729 October 2007,  Judge Berger UST Motion To Dismiss under 707(b) for presumed abuse based upon totality of circumstances was denied. The Court concluded that the debtors are entitled to claim vehicle ownership for expenses, even though [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/car-deduction-on-means-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
