<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Bankruptcy Law Information&#187; Judge Nugent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bankruptcykansas.info/tag/judge-nugent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Negative Equity</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/negative-equity/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/negative-equity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1327]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1329]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[910 car claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kuhasz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase money security interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEGATIVE EQUITY ISSUE NOT RULED UPON IN 1327 CASE In re Kuhasz, Case No. 07-20282 November 2008, Judge Somers Court noted split within the district. Judge Karlin excluded negative equity from PMSI claim in In re Padgett, 389 BR 203, while Judge Nugent included it. In re Ford 387 BR 14827 but declined to rule [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/conversion-moots-negative-equity-case/' rel='bookmark' title='Conversion Moots Negative Equity Case'>Conversion Moots Negative Equity Case</a> <small>Court watchers will have to wait for another case to...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/910-car-claims-get-interest/' rel='bookmark' title='910 Car Claims Get Interest'>910 Car Claims Get Interest</a> <small>SURRENDER IN FULL SATISFACTION OF 910 AND PAYMENT IN FULL...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/force-placed-insurance-part-of-910-vehicle-claim/' rel='bookmark' title='Is Force Placed Insurance Part of 910 Vehicle Claim?'>Is Force Placed Insurance Part of 910 Vehicle Claim?</a> <small>COST OF FORCED PLACED INSURANCE IS PART OF PMSI FOR...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/negative-equity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Is My Attorney Paid to Defend Dismissal?</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-my-attorney-paid-defend-dismissal/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-my-attorney-paid-defend-dismissal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtor attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defending dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumptive fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/3665/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WICHITA NO LOOK FEE FOR DEFENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS MAY BE $350.00 In re Kiser, Case No. 06-11453 January 2009, Judge Nugent Debtor filed a motion to modify plan to increase monthly payment and to pay attorney fees of $500.00. Court allowed $400.00. Judge Nugent quoted Judge Karlin in Beck in supporting its conclusion that [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-wichita/' rel='bookmark' title='How Much Are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Wichita?'>How Much Are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Wichita?</a> <small>13 ATTORNEY FEES IN WICHITA In re Mayer, Case No....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-topeka/' rel='bookmark' title='How Much are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Topeka?'>How Much are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Topeka?</a> <small>13 ATTORNEY FEES IN TOPEKA In re Beck, Case No....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/my-car-is-paid-for-can-i-deduct-ownership-expense-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?'>My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?</a> <small>OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-my-attorney-paid-defend-dismissal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Wichita?</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-wichita/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-wichita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filing Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[330]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presumptive fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[13 ATTORNEY FEES IN WICHITA In re Mayer, Case No. 06-10013 October 2006, Judge Nugent This is Judge Nugent’s fee decision. The “presumptive” fee in Wichita is $2500, without prejudice to fee applications, based upon the language of 330, testimony and the various factors recited. Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee Related posts: How Much are [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-topeka/' rel='bookmark' title='How Much are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Topeka?'>How Much are Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Fees in Topeka?</a> <small>13 ATTORNEY FEES IN TOPEKA In re Beck, Case No....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-my-attorney-paid-defend-dismissal/' rel='bookmark' title='How Much Is My Attorney Paid to Defend Dismissal?'>How Much Is My Attorney Paid to Defend Dismissal?</a> <small>WICHITA NO LOOK FEE FOR DEFENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS MAY...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/' rel='bookmark' title='Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies'>Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies</a> <small>A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-much-chapter-13-bankruptcy-fees-wichita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reconversion Fails, No Discharge Bankruptcy Dismissed</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/reconversion-fails-no-discharge-bankruptcy-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/reconversion-fails-no-discharge-bankruptcy-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not eligible for discharge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CONVERSION CONFUSION In re Fry, Case No. 04-16887 October 2008 Judge Nugent Debtor converted from 13 to 7 and then learned she was not eligible for a 7 and attempted to converted back to 13. Case dismissed as an “end run” around 7 discharge. Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee Related posts: Debtor May Be Converted [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/debtor-may-be-converted-7-no-discharge/' rel='bookmark' title='Debtor May Be Converted to 7 with No Discharge'>Debtor May Be Converted to 7 with No Discharge</a> <small>DEBTORS MAY BE CONVERTED TO 7 EVEN THOUGH NOT ELIGIBLE...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-long-does-chapter-13-last-if-my-income-below-median/' rel='bookmark' title='How Long Does Chapter 13 Last if My Income is Below Median?'>How Long Does Chapter 13 Last if My Income is Below Median?</a> <small>BELOW MEDIAN MUST RUN 36 MONTHS, B22C IS TEMPORAL In...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/no-credit-counseling-certificate-no-bankruptcy/' rel='bookmark' title='No Credit Counseling Certificate, No Bankruptcy'>No Credit Counseling Certificate, No Bankruptcy</a> <small>109(h) CREDIT COUNSELING NOT OBTAINED WITHIN 180 DAYS IS FATAL...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/reconversion-fails-no-discharge-bankruptcy-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreclosure No Excuse for No Credit Counseling Before Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/foreclose-no-excuse-for-no-credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/foreclose-no-excuse-for-no-credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Outcomes, Fraud, Bankruptcy Crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filing Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[109(h)(1)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exigent circumstances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro se]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAILURE TO OBTAIN CREDIT COUNSELING—EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES In re Thomas, Case No. 06-10242 March 2006, Judge Nugent Pro se case dismissed for failure to obtain credit counseling. Certificate of exigent circumstances which recites pending foreclosure insufficient, case dismissed. 109(h)(1).﻿ Related posts: No Credit Counseling Certificate, No Bankruptcy 109(h) CREDIT COUNSELING NOT OBTAINED WITHIN 180 DAYS IS [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/no-credit-counseling-certificate-no-bankruptcy/' rel='bookmark' title='No Credit Counseling Certificate, No Bankruptcy'>No Credit Counseling Certificate, No Bankruptcy</a> <small>109(h) CREDIT COUNSELING NOT OBTAINED WITHIN 180 DAYS IS FATAL...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/' rel='bookmark' title='Credit Counseling Before Bankruptcy'>Credit Counseling Before Bankruptcy</a> <small>Everyone who files a bankruptcy must get a credit counseling...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/no-counseling-for-involuntary-bankruptcy/' rel='bookmark' title='No Counseling for Involuntary Bankruptcy'>No Counseling for Involuntary Bankruptcy</a> <small>INVOLUNTARY DEBTOR NOT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN PRE PETITION COUNSELING In...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/foreclose-no-excuse-for-no-credit-counseling-before-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-bankruptcy-means-test-for-expenses-too/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-bankruptcy-means-test-for-expenses-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[22C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B22C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy means test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtor's expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE In re Melvin, Case No. 07-22352 December 2008 Judge Somers Court extended the Lanning analysis and found there was no binding precedent on the issue of whether actual of 22C expenses were mandated and found that 22C expenses may be deviated from also. This is consistent with dicta in Lanning, [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-do-i-deduct-my-non-filing-spouses-expenses-on-the-bankruptcy-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='How Do I Deduct My Non-Filing Spouse&#8217;s Expenses on the Bankruptcy Means Test?'>How Do I Deduct My Non-Filing Spouse&#8217;s Expenses on the Bankruptcy Means Test?</a> <small>HOW EXACTLY DO WE DEDUCT ‘MARITAL ADJUSTMENTS’? In re Dugan,...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/income-and-expenses-after-bankruptcy-change-chapter-13-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='Income and Expenses After Bankruptcy Change Chapter 13 Means Test'>Income and Expenses After Bankruptcy Change Chapter 13 Means Test</a> <small>REITERATION THAT INCOME AND EXPENSE CHANGES MAY BE CONSIDERED POST...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/means-test-form-controls-unless-significant-changes-circumstances/' rel='bookmark' title='Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances'>Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances</a> <small>B22C CONTROLS UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES In re Lanning,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-bankruptcy-means-test-for-expenses-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cram down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current monthly income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtor's expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secured debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME (CMI) ON LINE 47 OF B22C In re Hoss, Case No. 08-10365 In re Arroyo, Case No. 07-12779 August 2008, Judge Nugent In above median income (AMI) cases, debtors sought to deduct contract payments, rather than the stripped off/crammed down amounts. [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-bankruptcy-means-test-for-expenses-too/' rel='bookmark' title='Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too'>Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too</a> <small>LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE In re Melvin, Case No....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/deduct-full-secured-debt-on-bankruptcy-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='Deduct Full Secured Debt on Bankruptcy Means Test'>Deduct Full Secured Debt on Bankruptcy Means Test</a> <small>OK FOR CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS TO TAKE B22C DEDUCTION FOR...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test'>401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test</a> <small>401(K) DISBURSEMENT PRE PETITION IS CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME BUT NOT...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325(b)(1)(B)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeThample]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disposable income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projected disposable income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=3405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[401(K) DISBURSEMENT PRE PETITION IS CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME BUT NOT PROJECTED DISPOSBLE INCOME In re DeThample, Case No 07-11829 July 5, 2008, Judge Nugent Under 1325(b)(1)(B), a singular, one time disbursement is “income” for purposes of determining Current Monthly Income (CMI), but followed Judge Karlin’s Lanning decision in determining what constituted Projected Disposable Income (PDI). [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/my-car-is-paid-for-can-i-deduct-ownership-expense-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?'>My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?</a> <small>OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/' rel='bookmark' title='Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies'>Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies</a> <small>A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/means-test-form-controls-unless-significant-changes-circumstances/' rel='bookmark' title='Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances'>Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances</a> <small>B22C CONTROLS UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES In re Lanning,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/401k-withdrawal-income-for-means-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deduct Full Secured Debt on Bankruptcy Means Test</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deduct-full-secured-debt-on-bankruptcy-means-test/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deduct-full-secured-debt-on-bankruptcy-means-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1325(b)(1)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cram down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoss and Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Karlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secured claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcykansas.info/2009/12/24/2913/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK FOR CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS TO TAKE B22C DEDUCTION FOR FULL PAYMENT RATHER THAN CRAM DOWN AMOUNT In re Allen, Case No. 07-41327 February 2008, Judge Karlin Objected to confirmation on the basis that Debtor&#8217;s means test calculations erroneously included the full amount of the pre-petition car payments rather than the reduced or  crammed-down amounts. [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/timeshare-debt-allowed-on-means-test-adult-child-disallowed/' rel='bookmark' title='Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed'>Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed</a> <small>MORE LINE BY LINES OF B22C In re Hays, Case...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/cram-down-value-used-for-means-test-in-wichita-bankruptcies/' rel='bookmark' title='Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies'>Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies</a> <small>A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/how-do-i-deduct-my-non-filing-spouses-expenses-on-the-bankruptcy-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='How Do I Deduct My Non-Filing Spouse&#8217;s Expenses on the Bankruptcy Means Test?'>How Do I Deduct My Non-Filing Spouse&#8217;s Expenses on the Bankruptcy Means Test?</a> <small>HOW EXACTLY DO WE DEDUCT ‘MARITAL ADJUSTMENTS’? In re Dugan,...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/deduct-full-secured-debt-on-bankruptcy-means-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Car Deduction Allowed on Means Test, Reversed by District Court</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/car-deduction-allowed-on-means-test-reversed-by-district-court/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/car-deduction-allowed-on-means-test-reversed-by-district-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Jill Michaux, Topeka Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camacho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Lundstrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projected disposable income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wieland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcykansas.info/?p=2907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CAR DEDUCTIONS ALLOWED EVEN THOUGH NO LIEN In re Thomas, Case No 06-21108 In re Camacho, Case No. 06-20729 October 2007,  Judge Berger UST Motion To Dismiss under 707(b) for presumed abuse based upon totality of circumstances was denied. The Court concluded that the debtors are entitled to claim vehicle ownership for expenses, even though [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/topeka-debtors-get-means-test-deduction-for-cars-with-no-liens/' rel='bookmark' title='Topeka Debtors Allowed Means Test Deduction for Cars With No Liens'>Topeka Debtors Allowed Means Test Deduction for Cars With No Liens</a> <small>EDITOR UPDATE:  This post is out of date.  Judge Karlin...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/my-car-is-paid-for-can-i-deduct-ownership-expense-means-test/' rel='bookmark' title='My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?'>My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?</a> <small>OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/timeshare-debt-allowed-on-means-test-adult-child-disallowed/' rel='bookmark' title='Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed'>Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed</a> <small>MORE LINE BY LINES OF B22C In re Hays, Case...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/car-deduction-allowed-on-means-test-reversed-by-district-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

