<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Bankruptcy Law Information&#187; projected monthly income</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bankruptcykansas.info/tag/projected-monthly-income/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Topeka Attorneys Observe U.S. Supreme Court Bankruptcy Argument in Lanning</title>
		<link>http://bankruptcykansas.info/topeka-attorneys-observe-u-s-supreme-court-bankruptcy-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://bankruptcykansas.info/topeka-attorneys-observe-u-s-supreme-court-bankruptcy-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current monthly income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disposable income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projected monthly income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bankruptcykansas.info/?p=4065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We watched the arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., yesterday in the bankruptcy case of Hamilton v. Lanning. We are not involved in this case.  We attended as observers.  The case deals with the formula for determining how much a debtor has to pay her general creditors in a chapter 13 bankruptcy [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/keep-up-with-lanning-on-supreme-court-wiki/' rel='bookmark' title='U.S. Supreme Court Takes Topeka Bankruptcy Case'>U.S. Supreme Court Takes Topeka Bankruptcy Case</a> <small>A Topeka, Kansas, consumer bankruptcy case is pending in the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/deviation-from-bankruptcy-means-test-for-expenses-too/' rel='bookmark' title='Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too'>Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too</a> <small>LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE In re Melvin, Case No....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://bankruptcykansas.info/topeka-debtors-get-means-test-deduction-for-cars-with-no-liens/' rel='bookmark' title='Topeka Debtors Allowed Means Test Deduction for Cars With No Liens'>Topeka Debtors Allowed Means Test Deduction for Cars With No Liens</a> <small>EDITOR UPDATE:  This post is out of date.  Judge Karlin...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bankruptcykansas.info/topeka-attorneys-observe-u-s-supreme-court-bankruptcy-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

