Topeka Debtors Allowed Means Test Deduction for Cars With No Liens

EDITOR UPDATE:  This post is out of date.  Judge Karlin reverted to her original ruling in In re Law after the Pearson decision was vacated.  This issue is currently pending the the U.S. Court for the Tenth Circuit  so we should have a binding ruling soon.  December 13, 2009.

Topeka Bankruptcy Judge Janice Miller Karlin announced last week that she is reversing course and will follow the Pearson decision to allow debtors a means test deduction for ownership of a car without a debt against it.

Judge Karlin had earlier disallowed the car ownership deduction in In re Law, 2008 WL 1867971 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2008), following the decision by Kansas District Court Judge John W. Lungstrum in Wieland v. Thomas, 382 B.R. 793 (D. Kan. March 4, 2008), reversing Judge Robert D. Berger of Kansas City, KS, in In re Thomas, 2007 WL 2903201 (Bankr. D. Kan. Oct. 02, 2007).

The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Tenth Circuit (BAP) issued its decision, In Re Pearson, WY-07-097, on July 28, 2008, ruling 11 U.S.C. 707(b)(2)(A)(ii) (I) allows a debtor to take the full vehicle ownership/lease expense deduction even when the debtor’s vehicle is unencumbered by lease or secured payments at the time of the bankruptcy filing.

Chief Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Nugent of Wichta had disallowed the allowance in In re Howell, 366 B.R. 153 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2007).

None of these court decisions are binding on any other bankruptcy cases.  Pearson has been appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, whose ultimate ruling will be binding on courts in Kansas.  Judge Karlin, newly appointed to the BAP, said she was obliged to follow a decision by her BAP colleagues despite her great respect for Judge Lungstrum.

Whether or not a car ownership allowance can be taken for a paid for car on the means test is the subject of many opposing bankruptcy court opinions  around the country.  See the Bankruptcy Law Network for more information.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr
PrintFriendlyShare

Related posts:

  1. Car Deduction Allowed on Means Test, Reversed by District Court CAR DEDUCTIONS ALLOWED EVEN THOUGH NO LIEN In re Thomas, Case No 06-21108 In re Camacho, Case No. 06-20729 October...
  2. Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed MORE LINE BY LINES OF B22C In re Hays, Case No 07-41285 April, 2008, Judge Karlin 13 Trustee objections to...
  3. Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances B22C CONTROLS UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES In re Lanning, Case No. 06-41037 May 2007, Judge Karlin Over the Chapter...
  4. GAP Insurance Not In Car Lender's PMSI GAP insurance, service contracts, administrative fees and the traded-in car payoff are not part of a car lender’s purchase-money secured...
  5. Deduct Full Secured Debt on Bankruptcy Means Test OK FOR CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS TO TAKE B22C DEDUCTION FOR FULL PAYMENT RATHER THAN CRAM DOWN AMOUNT In re Allen,...