BUSINESS USE MUST BE “SIGNIFICANT” TO ESCAPE 910 FULL PAYMENT
In re Wilson, Case No. 06-40637
December 2006, Judge Karlin

Debtor sought to avoid the full payment requirement of the 910 car loan provision. Debtors were using the vehicles in question for personal and business use, as they served as foster parents. The court followed Lowder and Bolze. The Court adopted a “significant and material” approach and found that the vehicles were used “significantly” for personal purposes in finding that the vehicles were subject to the 910 paragraph.

Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee

Related posts:

1. What Is Personal Use of Vehicle for 910 Claim?
2. 910 Car Claims Get Interest
3. Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances
4. 13 Plan Length Figured as of Bankruptcy Filing Date
5. Creditor Gets Deficiency Claim After Collateral Surrender