INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTION OF COLLATERAL?
In re Murrow, Case No. 07-41061
March 2008, Judge Karlin
Creditor was give an additional time to amend its complaint. Debtor took the 5th but the intimation of the discussion in the decision is that debtor likely intentionally destroyed the vehicle but insufficient facts were alleged.
Digest by: Jan Hamilton, Trustee
Related posts:
- Creditor Gets Deficiency Claim After Collateral Surrender 10th CIRCUIT ‘RULES’ In re Rule, Case No. 06-22145 July, 2008, Judge Berger Judge Berger followed In re Ballard 526...
- Debtor May Be Converted to 7 with No Discharge DEBTORS MAY BE CONVERTED TO 7 EVEN THOUGH NOT ELIGIBLE FOR 7 DISCHARGE In re Rogers, Case No. 08-21487 January...
- Surrendered Collateral Doesn’t Count on Bankruptcy Means Test? 22C EXPENSE NOT PERMITTED ON SURRENDERED COLLATERAL In re Miller, Case No. 07-22927 December 2008, Judge Somers This decision ties...
- Nonworking Adult Son Not Counted in Household B22C CASE, LINE BY LINE… In re Law, Case No. 07-40863 April 2008, Judge Karlin Court sustained 13 Trustee’s objection...
- What Is Personal Use of Vehicle for 910 Claim? PERSONAL VS. BUSINESS USE FOR 910 CAR CLAIMS In re Lowder, Case No. 05-44802 August 2006, Judge Karlin Creditor objected...
