LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE
In re Melvin, Case No. 07-22352
December 2008 Judge Somers
Court extended the Lanning analysis and found there was no binding precedent on the issue of whether actual of 22C expenses were mandated and found that 22C expenses may be deviated from also. This is consistent with dicta in Lanning, and Judge Nugent in In Re Hoss, 08-10365, and In re Arroyo, No. 07-12779. It may also be inconsistent with Judge Karlin in the bankruptcy court decision in Lanning.
Lanning has been appealed by the bankruptcy trustee and is currently pending in the U.S. Supreme Court. Oral argument is expected in March 2010.
Digest by: Jan Hamilton, Trustee
Related posts:
- How Do I Deduct My Non-Filing Spouse’s Expenses on the Bankruptcy Means Test?
- Means Test Form Controls Unless Significant Changes in Circumstances
- Surrendered Collateral Doesn’t Count on Bankruptcy Means Test?
- Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed
- Income and Expenses After Bankruptcy Change Chapter 13 Means Test
[...] Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too [...]
[...] re Tholl, Case No. 07-22677 December 2008, Judge Somers Court reviewed and followed the Melvin decision regarding changes of income and expenses after the filing of the chapter 13 bankruptcy but [...]