Gap Insurance, Warranty Not PMSI

“TRANSFORMATION” RULE AND NEGATIVE EQUITY DISCUSSED; GAP
INSURANCE, SERVICE CONTRACT NOT PART OF COLLATERAL
In re Miller, Case No 08-40935
December 2008, Judge Karlin

Debtor sought, and was permitted, to pay only the cost of the car, rather than cost plus other charges. Court did not rule on whether certain fees not adequately addressed by either side were part of the PMSI. Good discussion of the transformation rule and negative equity.

Digest by:  Jan Hamilton, Trustee

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Tipd
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. GAP Insurance Not In Car Lender's PMSI
  2. Negative Equity
  3. Conversion Moots Negative Equity Case
  4. Do I Have to Pay My Creditor’s Attorneys Fees?
  5. Is Force Placed Insurance Part of 910 Vehicle Claim?
One Response to Gap Insurance, Warranty Not PMSI
Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to log in.

Trackback URL http://bankruptcykansas.info/gap-insurance-warranty-not-pmsi/trackback/
eXTReMe Tracker