“TRANSFORMATION” RULE AND NEGATIVE EQUITY DISCUSSED; GAP
INSURANCE, SERVICE CONTRACT NOT PART OF COLLATERAL
In re Miller, Case No 08-40935
December 2008, Judge Karlin
Debtor sought, and was permitted, to pay only the cost of the car, rather than cost plus other charges. Court did not rule on whether certain fees not adequately addressed by either side were part of the PMSI. Good discussion of the transformation rule and negative equity.
Digest by: Jan Hamilton, Trustee
Related posts:
- GAP Insurance Not In Car Lender's PMSI GAP insurance, service contracts, administrative fees and the traded-in car payoff are not part of a car lender’s purchase-money secured...
- Negative Equity NEGATIVE EQUITY ISSUE NOT RULED UPON IN 1327 CASE In re Kuhasz, Case No. 07-20282 November 2008, Judge Somers Court...
- Is Force Placed Insurance Part of 910 Vehicle Claim? COST OF FORCED PLACED INSURANCE IS PART OF PMSI FOR 910 VEHICLE In re Townsend, Case No 07-20956 April 2008,...
- New Rule: Chapter 13 Mortgage Payments Through Trustee The Kansas Bankruptcy Court adopted a new rule requiring chapter 13 debtors behind on mortgage debts when the bankruptcy case...
- Conversion Moots Negative Equity Case Court watchers will have to wait for another case to find out how the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
