B22C CONTROLS UNLESS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES
In re Lanning, Case No. 06-41037
May 2007, Judge Karlin
Over the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection, the Court confirmed the plan because of significant changes in circumstances at the time of filing that caused Line 58 on B22C to be higher than what the debtor could afford to pay. BAP and 10th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, Petition for Cert to U.S. Supreme Court pending. Lanning controls in Judge Karlin’s court, until, if and when, the decision is overturned.
Digest by: Jan Hamilton, Trustee
Related posts:
- Deviation from Bankruptcy Means Test for Expenses, Too LANNING EXTENDED TO EXPENSE SIDE In re Melvin, Case No. 07-22352 December 2008 Judge Somers Court extended the Lanning analysis...
- 401(k) Withdrawal Is Income for Means Test 401(K) DISBURSEMENT PRE PETITION IS CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME BUT NOT PROJECTED DISPOSBLE INCOME In re DeThample, Case No 07-11829 July...
- Cram Down Value Used for Means Test in Wichita Bankruptcies A DEBTOR MUST USE THE STRIPPED/CRAMMED DOWN AMOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME (CMI) ON LINE 47 OF B22C...
- Timeshare Debt Allowed on Means Test, Adult Child Disallowed MORE LINE BY LINES OF B22C In re Hays, Case No 07-41285 April, 2008, Judge Karlin 13 Trustee objections to...
- Surrendered Collateral Doesn’t Count on Bankruptcy Means Test? 22C EXPENSE NOT PERMITTED ON SURRENDERED COLLATERAL In re Miller, Case No. 07-22927 December 2008, Judge Somers This decision ties...
