“TRANSFORMATION” RULE AND NEGATIVE EQUITY DISCUSSED; GAP
INSURANCE, SERVICE CONTRACT NOT PART OF COLLATERAL
In re Miller, Case No 08-40935
December 2008, Judge Karlin
Debtor sought, and was permitted, to pay only the cost of the car, rather than cost plus other charges. Court did not rule on whether certain fees not adequately addressed by either side were part [...]
Topeka Attorneys Helping You Get The Fresh Start Only The Federal Bankruptcy Laws Can Give You
Category Archives: Vehicles
Gap Insurance, Warranty Not PMSI
Negative Equity
NEGATIVE EQUITY ISSUE NOT RULED UPON IN 1327 CASE
In re Kuhasz, Case No. 07-20282
November 2008, Judge Somers
Court noted split within the district. Judge Karlin excluded negative equity from PMSI claim in In re Padgett, 389 BR 203, while Judge Nugent included it. In re Ford 387 BR 14827 but declined to rule on the issue [...]
What Is Business Use of Vehicle?
BUSINESS USE MUST BE “SIGNIFICANT” TO ESCAPE 910 FULL PAYMENT
In re Wilson, Case No. 06-40637
December 2006, Judge Karlin
Debtor sought to avoid the full payment requirement of the 910 car loan provision. Debtors were using the vehicles in question for personal and business use, as they served as foster parents. The court followed Lowder and Bolze. [...]
Creditor Gets Deficiency Claim After Collateral Surrender
10th CIRCUIT ‘RULES’
In re Rule, Case No. 06-22145
July, 2008, Judge Berger
Judge Berger followed In re Ballard 526 F. 3d 634 (10th Cir. 2008), in finding that a 910 car loan may have a deficiency balance after sale of the vehicle.
Cramdown of Daughter’s Car Bad Faith
CAR OWNED BY CHILD CAN BE CRAMMED DOWN BUT NOT GOOD FAITH
In re Lewis, Case No. 06-20027
August 2006, Judge Somers
The vehicle the debtors proposed to cramdown in the plan was found to belong to the daughter, even though titled to debtors. Daughter made the payments. However, the Court found that the plan was not filed [...]
910 Car Claims Get Interest
SURRENDER IN FULL SATISFACTION OF 910 AND PAYMENT IN FULL
WITH NOT INTEREST NOT ALLOWED
In re McClay, Case No. 07-20106
October 2008, Judge Berger
910 vehicle case. Plan provided for payment of full debt with no interest and option to surrender in full satisfaction. This was found to be an attempt to modify prospectively and Court opined that [...]
What Is Personal Use of Vehicle for 910 Claim?
PERSONAL VS. BUSINESS USE FOR 910 CAR CLAIMS
In re Lowder, Case No. 05-44802
August 2006, Judge Karlin
Creditor objected to confirmation as debtor sought to avoid the 910 car loan restriction by arguing that she used the car to get to and from work and, therefore, not “personal”. Debtor contended that Toyota is entitled to no interest. [...]
Is Force Placed Insurance Part of 910 Vehicle Claim?
COST OF FORCED PLACED INSURANCE IS PART OF PMSI FOR 910 VEHICLE
In re Townsend, Case No 07-20956
April 2008, Judge Somers
Noting that BAPCPA does not define PMSI but that the phrase is a term of art under the UCC, the Court found that under Missouri law, 9-103 governs and forced place insurance falls within the Missouri [...]
What Is Collateral in Bankruptcy?
Collateral: The property that is subject to a lien. A creditor with rights in collateral is a secured creditor and has additional protections in the Bankruptcy Code for the claim secured by collateral. The measure of the secured claim is the value of the collateral available to secure the claim: it is possible to have [...]
My Car Is Paid For, Can I Deduct Ownership Expense on Means Test?
OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR
In re Howell, Case No. 06-11652
April 2007, Judge Nugent
Trustee objected to 13 confirmation under 1325(b)(1)(B) on basis that debtors projected disposable income was too low because they were deducted an ownership expense on Line 28 of B22C even though vehicle was fully paid for and even though they [...]
Topeka Chapter 13 Trustee Inducted into American College of Bankruptcy
Jan Michael Hamilton, standing chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee for cases filed in Topeka, was inducted into the American College of Bankruptcy Friday. Hamilton was in the private practice of law from 1973 through 1999 when he was named to the trustee post.
Hamilton traveled to Washington, D.C., for the ceremony at the U.S. Supreme Court building. [...]
What Interest Rate Does the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Trustee Pay on Secured Claims?
EXPLANATION OF THE TOPEKA DISCOUNT RATE
by Jan Hamilton, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee
The Discount Rate (Interest Rate) for chapter 13 bankruptcy cases filed in Topeka, Kansas, on or after March 1, 2009, is 4.75%.
This rate will typically be changed no more than once a month, on the beginning of the
month.
Beginning on July 1, 2004, we began [...]
Beware of Payday Loans, Auto Title Loans
Beware of Credit Offers Aimed at Recent Bankruptcy Filers
Small Loans
It is always best to save some money to cover unexpected expenses so you can avoid borrowing. But if you are in need of a small loan, avoid the following high cost loans:
Payday loans
Some “check cashers” and finance companies offer to take a personal check from [...]
Do I Have to Reaffirm Car Loans, Home Mortgages?
If you are behind on a car loan or a home mortgage and you can afford to catch up, you can reaffirm and possibly keep your car or home. If the lender agrees to give you the time you need to get caught up on a default, this may be a good reason to reaffirm. [...]
Do I Have Other Options for Secured Debts Other than Reaffirmation?
You may be able to keep the collateral on a secured debt by paying the creditor in a lump sum the amount the item is worth rather than what you owe on the loan. This is your right under the bankruptcy law to “redeem” the collateral.
Redeeming collateral can save you hundreds of dollars. Because furniture, [...]
Should I Reaffirm a Debt?
If you are thinking about reaffirming, the first question should always be whether you can afford the monthly payments. Reaffirming any debt means that you are agreeing to make the payments every month, and to face the consequences if you don’t. The reaffirmation agreement must include information about your income and expenses and your signed [...]
Do I Have to Reaffirm the Same Terms?
No. A reaffirmation is a new contract between you and the lender. You should try to get the creditor to agree to better terms such as a lower monthly payment or interest rate. You can also try to negotiate a reduction in the amount you owe. The lender may refuse but it is always worth [...]
-
Jill Michaux & Mark Neis
Attorneys at Law
Bankruptcy Law Office
Neis & Michaux, P.A.
825 Bank of America Tower
534 S. Kansas Ave., Ste. 825
Topeka, KS 66603-3446
T: 785-354-1471
F: 785-354-1170
lawyers@neismichaux.com
Board Certified in
Consumer Bankruptcy Law
by the American Board of
Certification